| Stalling Tactics used by
Some Physician Groups against JCAHO Standards
“Standards set by the Joint Commission for Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations can help medical staffs deal with disruptive
physician behavior in a fair, organized fashion. Should a physician’s
disruptive behavior reflect a health problem, the JCAHO standards go
further to require the medical staff to implement a process to identify
and manage the individual physician’s health-related matters. In some
cases disruptive behavior may be reasonably interpreted to require anger
and/or stress management or formal behavioral counseling and
monitoring.”
-- Michael D. Youssi
Physicians accused of
“disruptive behavior” are organizing to develop stalling tactics to
delay being held accountable for alleged “disruptive behavior by
hospital committees responsible for disciplining doctors. While the new
standards were introduced in April, many hospitals have been unable to
institute these new requirements because of the opposition of some
physician groups.
The 360-Degree Feedback which is a respected technique in coaching
is being used to delay for at least 6 months, any action against
physicians whose behavior defined as “disruptive. The 360-Degree
Feedback refers to a process in which data is collected from multiple
sources or multiple raters surrounding the person being assessed.
Respondents may include self, supervisor, reporting employees, peers,
and, in some cases vendors/clients. Applications include performance
appraisal, professional development, succession planning, assessing
organizational climate, and targeted competency areas specific to the
individual being assessed.
Physicians who are mandated to enroll
in a coaching program for anger are given an opportunity to opt for the
above assessment which will be conducted twice over a 6 month period. If
the initial assessment does not indicated “bad behavior” on the part of
the physician, any further action against him or her is dismissed. If
the assessment indicates problem behavior, the physician is given
another three months to change the behavior in question. If the 6 month
assessments suggest the need for professional help, the physician is
then mandated to enroll in an anger management coaching program.
It is likely that a careful, objective monitoring of this novel program
will reveal that it is a stalling tactic rather than a reasonable
response for “disruptive behavior”.
George Anderson, MSW, BCD, CAMF Diplomate, American Association
of Anger Management Providers
|
|